The start of Garabagh war?
(начало в пред. номере)
Sumgait, located at 30 km distance from Baku, was chosen deliberately. Most of the 4 thousand Azerbaijani Turks forced to flee from their homes in Armenia, found asylum in Sumgait and they were angry because of atrocities of Armenians against them. Even during the Soviet era the population of the city, which was named as “dead zone” was inclined to radical actions due to their poor plight. That is why it became possible to trigger wide-scaled riots there. As a result of riots lasted for a day there were destroyed houses of Armenians, tens of people were injured and 32 people were killed, of these 26 Armenians, 5 Azerbaijani Turks and 1 Lezgin. Documents of investigation held afterwards named Azerbaijani Turk Ahmed Ahmedov and Armenian Eduard Grigoryan as the leaders of riots. The fact that one of the leaders was Armenian makes everything clear. It is also known that almost all Armenians killed were those who refused to pay money to funds of Armenian terrorist organizations. Let us now consider a few facts. L.Mejlumyan, one of the victims of events in Sumgait said: “Grigoryan intruded into my flat, hit my ill mother by a leg of chair, which was broken by him and despite my attempts to stop him, as a woman I was not strong enough to do it, so, he thrown me down and started to do what he wanted”. A young man of a surname Najafov, who participated in those events told to investigators that the “gang organized by Grigoryan intruded in house N 512 of an Armenian woman by name Emma, undressed her and Edik Grigoryan offered to take her out to the street and then the woman was savagely killed. In other part of investigation documents it was indicated that “E.Grigoryan together with his gang intruded into the flat of M.Petrosyan who lived in the first mikroregion, hit him to head to death”. During the events in Sumgait, E. Grigoryan personally killed 5 Armenians and raped 8 Armenian women. There are a number of such facts. Armenian organizations succeeded to protect from punishment of E.Grigoryan, who initiated such serious crimes. The court sentenced Azerbaijani Turk Ahmed Ahmedov to death and the sentence was immediately implemented. E.Grigoryan was sentenced to 12 years of imprisonment and in a few years he was freed. These events confirmed once more the famous phrase: “for Armenians the best Armenian is dead Armenian”. Armenians always were able to derive a benefit from their dead or killed compatriots. Armenians also pursued to take an advantage from events in Sumgait for their tricky plans. So, they immediately started activity to represent to international community an incorrect idea about these events and trigger anti-Azerbaijan attitude. On the other hand, Armenian organizations attempted to make confrontation between Azerbaijan and Armenia as irreversible, make it even deeper and brought to zero the perspectives of peaceful resolution.
Armenians continued their terrorist attacks. On March 10 to the south of Yerevan there were killed 4 villagers from a village Mehmandar populated by Azerbaijani Turks. More than 100 houses were put on fire in villages of Ararat region on March 25 and population was forced to flee. In Armenia the attacks to villages populated by Azerbaijani Turks became an ordinary case.
Increasing tension in the region forced the government in Moscow to undertake a series of measures. Additional military units were sent to the conflict zone. At the end of February the number of armed forces of Moscow in Azerbaijan and Armenia reached 13 thousand people. Practically at the same time the first armed groups were formed in the territory of Armenia. These groups subjected to “Committee of Garabagh” operated in Yerevan and created with assistance of international Armenian terrorist organizations. L.Ter-Petrosyan was one of the leaders of this Committee, who later was elected the President of Armenia. Until the summer of 1988 these armed groups turned into well-organized forces, which were supplied by hunting and military weapons. Simultaneously, in rural regions of Armenia along the border there were created the “groups of self-defense”. All these groups were ruled from a single center – leaders of movement of Armenian nationalists.
Источник: http://karabakh-doc.azerall.info/ru/isegod/The_start_of_Garabagh_war.pdf
Samuel A.Weems
“Armenia: secrets of terrorist “Christian” state”
The great series of Armenian frauds
Vol. I
(beginning in previous flimsies)
Charter Five
ARMENIA LOSES UNPROVOKED WAR ON GEORGIA
Armenians Seek Free Handouts from the Christian World
Another source that proves Armenian betrayal and disloyalty, and which must be brought into this argument at this time, is a letter written by Boghos Nubarian. He was the head of the Armenian National Delegation to Paris Peace Conference. He wrote a letter that was published in the Times of London on January 30, 1919, indicating the Armenians had been, since the beginning of the war, de facto belligerents. They fought alongside the Allies on all fronts, in Palestine and Syria, where the Armenian volunteers, recruited by the Armenian National Delegation at the request of the French government, made up more than half of the French contingent. In the Caucasus, where, without mentioning the 150,000 Armenians in the Imperial Russian Army, more than 40,000 of their volunteers offered resistance to the Turkish Armies.
This letter, in conjunction with the revelations in Hovannissian’s book, clearly shows who the aggressor was: Armenians! Some in French uniforms, some in Russian uniforms, some in Ottoman uniforms, some in no uniforms. Different uniforms but same malice: annihilate the Turks! Here, the Armenian leader is saying to the victorious allies: “We helped you out by backstabbing the Turks – where is our reward?”
Note that there is no word about genocide (a term not coined until 1948) or even descriptions that may remotely be construed to mean genocide. If the Armenians were really subjected to genocide, why does their “chief of delegation” forget to mention it in his letter addressing the allies? Why do the allies dismiss the Armenian claims? If the allies dismissed the Armenian claims then, why would they or should they accept them now?
Charter Six
AMERICAN ADMIRAL SEES ARMENIAN’S CLAIMS AS “ABSOLUTELY FALSE”
Peace conference gives Armenians nothing after hearing their claim for money damages
The Paris Peace Conference ended on June 28, 1919. The conference work became known as the Treaty of Versailles. European matters were dealt with and the League of Nations was born. This treaty did not deal with the Ottoman Empire. That matter was to be resolved at a later time.
The Armenians, who were refused a place at the conference, continued to hang around the treaty proceedings attempting to get handouts from anyone who would listen to them. The Armenians voiced strong objections to the fact the Allies ignored their demands of the following specific issues: “(1) To recognize the republic of Armenia, (2) To repatriate Armenian refugees and expel Muslim settlers from Turkish Armenia, (3) To undertake the military occupation of Turkish Armenia, and (4) To select forthwith a mandatory nation for Armenia. In each case, the response in Paris was either negative or indecisive” (R. Hovannissian. Armenian Republic, I volume, California University, Los-Angeles, P. 292).
The Armenian agents were busy during this time around the Christian world seeking support for their requests for free handouts.
Armenophile societies in Great Britain, France, Italy, Switzerland, Denmark, and especially the United States supported Armenia’s bid. The American Committee for the Independence of Armenia submitted petitions bearing the names of thousands who advocated recognition of the de facto government in Erevan. Even as the Peace Conference began its activities, twenty-five governors made public their hope for a reconstructed Armenia “within her historic boundaries”, a view reiterated in separate petitions by hundreds of American clergymen. By April of 1919 several advisers to the American delegation in Paris had come to favor recognition in order to provide Armenia sufficient international stature to float a 20 million dollar loan (P 293).
This is a perfect example of how Armenians played on the heartstrings of American Christians in an attempt to get all of the above items for nothing.
(to be continued)
ACTUAL QUOTE
Abdullah GUL,
Turkish President:
“Trying to normalize our relations with Armenia, we wish the normalization of the relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia. But the first condition is the liberation of Azerbaijani territories from occupation… I openly say that, the present de-facto situation does not favor anyone, neither does Armenia. We will do our best to solve this problem. The solution of such conflicts requires patience. And we will continue working with patience… The first condition of the peace in the region is Armenia’s withdrawal from the occupied territories”.
From the statement to IA APA, Istanbul, December 23, 2010
Vakil SEPAH,
Member of Iranian Parliament:
“The Minsk Group has been working for many years in order to solve Karabakh conflict. Of course it is not clear for us. The outside countries are not interested in solving of this problem. The solution of the problem will be with the participation of regional countries. Iran had offered its mediation to both Azerbaijan and Armenia. Azerbaijani government accepted this offer. We see that Azerbaijan use all the chances and is ready to use for solving the problem. Unfortunately Armenia didn’t accept this offer… The countries which keep Armenia in subjection don’t let it. Russia, USA, Minsk Group which keeps Armenia in subjection doesn’t allow doing that. I think that Armenia doesn’t say its own word. They fear of Iran’s participation in the solution of Nagorno-Karabakh problem and fear that Iran’s name will be declined positively. It is clear that Nagorno-Karabakh is Azerbaijani historical land. Iran will show its efforts toward the solution of this problem”.
From the statement to IA APA, Baku, December 30, 2010
Nasir Abdulkerim ABDURAHMAN,
Palestinian ambassador to Azerbaijan:
“Our position on Nagorno-Karabakh problem is obvious. We support Azerbaijan. This conflict must be solved on the basis of international law and UN resolutions… International community must increase attempts for regulation of Nagorno-Karabakh problem. The problem must be solved in a peaceful way, IDPs – must return to homelands”.
From the statement to IA APA, Baku, December 28, 2010
Aladdin BOYUKKAYA,
Turkish parliamentarian from AKP, OSCE PA:
“I think that, this problem does not concern to USA and other countries. Of course they also have an impact. But we know that Armenian armed forces had not occupied Azerbaijani lands. The Russian soldiers in Armenian military uniform occupied fraternal Azerbaijani lands. That’s why if Russia wants, the problem will be solved. This problem will be solved on the day which Russia gives instruction to Armenia on the solution of this problem”.
From the interview to APA’s Turkey bureau, Ankara, December 11, 2010
Armenians about Armenians
Robert ARAKELOV
KARABAKH DIARY
(beginning in the previous issues)
THE EMPTY COMPANY
Spending nearly a year in NKAP (Nagorno Karabakh Autonomic Province) and regularly reading the local half-official newspaper “Soviet Karabakh”, I can insist: it is impossible to search for unfitness over kindling national passions in any other part of the world. By the way, the newspaper gained its unfitness especially in the regularly held propagandist companies by itself. I can say that these propagandas were funny. For example, the newspaper published in its editions the theme “Let’s meet our alien friends with bread-salt” which encouraged the local habitants, the newspaper addressed the habitants with calling “Let’s be busy for archeology”, advising that going to the deepness of the ground although it can’t prove that this nation is the first, but at last it would be able to dig a trench or fortification for all the family, – things for the modern time, as if not at all unnecessary, and published a title under the name “Let’s learn the secrets of hand-to-hand fight and bayonet attack” and others in this manner. But I think that the greatest company for scale was under the title “Let’s reach and outrun the Azerbaijanis in the number of childbirth”. And here it is where the ill fantasy of the newspaper which is busy for nationalism, spread. It passionately called the habitants of the region from pensioners to pioneers not to be sorry for powder for reaching this aim, gave advices about how to save and use the powder. Asking for services of donjuans who were bred in the houses, the newspaper organized the cooperative “Intimate” near itself and the materials which were published by it proved that the journalists of “Soviet Karabakh” not only know the secrets of the second oldest job, but also the first. Respected matrons, who could make themselves comfortable on chairs very hardly, gave interviews to the newspaper about the benefit of having many children in pig-breeding and generally in agriculture, and their husbands suggested the brigade queue using the practice of a worker who can work on many benches at the same time, as the answer to the calling of the newspaper about fastened reproduction to life. Concretely, they tried everything, the newspaper periodically remembered the habitants about the necessity of reaching and outrunning Azerbaijanis in childbirth because of that someone’s appetite wouldn’t end with only Nagorno Karbakh, and so the soldiers would be very precious. It should be noted that the company helped the newspaper in increasing of its popularity very much. And the habitants were searching for the next and next articles on the editions of the newspaper about large families. And if the men were searching of display of the portion of fathers – shock workers, women were searching for their and others affection on growth of the life. And suddenly all these were ended. It was so sudden and absolute as if the company hadn’t been started ever. The cooperative “Intimate” was deleted, and it was possible to search for any little article about the below-mentioned theme which the habitants were very interested in. As if it wasn’t calling the habitants to reach and outrun the Azerbaijanis in childbirth. And that’s what happened. Somebody among the workers was informed about that a lonely mother Lizetta Tatevosyan grew up seven boys in a village. The head redactor of the newspaper was worried of this news and sent on an official trip to the village a photo-correspondent to be sure in this news and take photos of the seven boys with their mother and to know characteristics of the family. The correspondent, getting on a bus, could get the village after an hour, injuring his internal organs on the very bad way of the village, was at the needed place. He was sure in this information while the habitants of the village were bringing him to the village and it made him happy. But the driver of the bus informed the correspondent that it would be the last route for that day and it would leave for Stepanakert back after half an hour. And so, he had a little time and as soon as he arrived at the searched house, he jumped in the house, but the hostess wasn’t at home. But he could find the seven boys at home and he could talk with the oldest brother Petros, took his photo and knew their names. Half an hour was ending, the bus was going to go back to Stepanakert and so he couldn’t wait for the hostess. And taking her photo of the previous year which was given to him by Petros- the oldest brother, he returned. There was already given a photomontage on “Soviet Karabakh” which described the seven boys and interesting woman with the following writing on the next day: “Seven soldiers of Artsakh are cultivated by a lonely mother – Lizetta Tatevosyan. God helps our support would be enough for her”. This edition of the newspaper was jumping from hand to hand of the habitants, and the calling of the newspaper was reacted by many public associations of the region, first of all by “Miacum”. A lot of money and surprises run to Tatevosyan’s family, and the charity community “Amaras” decided to make financial support to the family for every month. The newspaper “Soviet Karabakh” wrote at those days: “The priceless treasury of Lizetta Tatevosyan in the solution of reaching and outrunning the Azerbaijanis in the number of childbirth”. There was created a special title “From newspaper for Lizetta” which the poems dedicated her were published at.
(to be continued)
Georgians about Armenians
Felix Tsertvadze
ARMENIA and NAGORNO KARABAKH
Growth of myths
(beginning in the previous issues)
Changes
LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, MR. GEORGE BUSH
Dear Mr. President!
My letter about that we all are witnesses of the great lie. Armenian lobby made a thesis about carnage of their half billion compatriots in 1915, mass deportation of Armenian population from Turkey. And there is a fundamental doubt for the solidity of this data, which was affirmed by the Armenian side.
Many people in Caucasus considered from their childhood that 800 thousand Armenians were killed in the tragedy of 1915. But nearly from 1967, according to initiative of the Armenian lobby, there was started periodic expansion of the data aiming to reach the number of loss of the Jewish during the First World War – Kholocost. It should be noted that approximately 1.5 billion Armenians lived in Turkey in the end of the XIX century. Terror acts of Armenian bands in Istanbul in 1895 caused the mass carnage of the Armenian population and their deportation to the regions of Mesopotamia and Syria which caused new wave of immigration of Armenians and there were nearly 800 thousand Armenians in Turkey until 1915.
In the end of 1914 under the patronage of the Russian armed groups which attacked very strongly, Armenians started the civil war against the Turkish in the eastern Anatoly and killed nearly 40 thousand Muslim including women and children. At the answer the Ottoman powers started the deportation of Armenian population that was accompanied by carnages during which 200-400 thousand people died. Armenian lobby insists that 1 500 000 people died, shamelessly including to this list of people who died in 1915 the following categories of the population:
1. Victims of the carnage in 1896-1897.
2. The immigrated people from Turkey who crossed the borders until 1915.
3. Inhabitants of the territories where were occupied by Russian army and were out of control of the Turkish powers.
4. The removed people but who stayed alive.
5. People who died normally.
6. People who died during the civil war.
7. People who were killed by Armenians themselves at the result of internal Armenian terror against traitors against their country.
8. People who died as the result of the activities of the members of the alliance.
9. People who died during the fights between the Kurds and the Turkish e. t. c.
Although the valid information about the exact number of loses of the Armenian population during the tragic events of 1915, doesn’t exist.
We all bow before the killed innocent people and pray the God to take compassion on them. But any irresponsible manipulation of their number according to wish of any politician or banker, would be insulting.
Armenian lobby tries hardly to express the stated version of the “genocide” to the world community related with that Turkey had recently published the concrete list of hundred thousand of Muslims who were killed by Armenians during 1910-1922 and made positive steps over solution of the situation in 1915. It stays clear that “genocide” against Armenians wasn’t in 1915, but from 1878 to 1923 which continued not for a year but the whole 45 years, nearly half a century, and not 1 500 000 people, but 2 000 000 people died. Considerable changes, aren’t they? But the most shameless is that Armenians don’t avoid from making quotations from Hitler’s speeches. But if Hitler was a cooperator with Armenians, then all commentaries would be insignificant.
It is time to solve this problem under power of authoritative commissions under leading of the USA. As you know, billions of people – the Europeans, Asians, Americans died at the terrible fights and genocides from 1878 to 1923. The Turkish killed Serbians, Macedonians, Bulgarians, and especially Greeks at their own territories. And on this condition, why only Armenians must get the international legal recognition?
Respectfully, Felix CERTVADZE.
5. 10. 2005 (didn’t get an answer)
LETTER TO HAAGA INTERNATIONAL COURT OVER CRIMINAL CASES RELATED WITH CRIMES AGAINST THE MANKIND
Help for punishment of killers
1. I accuse the above-mentioned people for the genocide against 15 thousand Armenians living in Baku, which caused the genocide against the whole population of Baku (Baku is the capital of Azerbaijan Republic):
M. Gorbachev – the former Chairman of Presidium of Supreme Soviet of SSSR, former president of SSSR.
V. Yazov – the former minister for defense of SSSR.
V. Bakatin – the former minister for foreign affairs of SSSR.
The genocide which was organized by them, started on January 13, 1990 and ended on January 24, 1990. 236 persons died as the result of the genocide: 157 Azerbaijanis, 38 Armenians, 6 Russians, 3 Jewish, 2 Tatars, 2 Lezgis among the civil population and 28 soldiers.
2. I accuse the above-mentioned people for the genocide against 7 thousand Khojalians – Azerbaijanis and Turkish-Mahsatis in Karabakh at the territories of Azerbaijan Republic:
E. Shaposhnikov – marshal, the former commander of Armed Forces of CIS (Council of Independent States), former republican of the states of SSSR including Russia.
B. Yeltsin – the former president of Russian Federation.
The genocide that was organized by them started on February 26, 1992 and ended on February 28, 1992. 613 civil people were killed.
All proofs of their sins, including photos, are demonstrated in my book named “The forgotten genocide”, on the pages 70-119 and other pages. The book is attached to the letter.
3. I ask you to raise a criminal case against M. Gorbachev, D. Yazov, V. Bakatin, R. Kocharyan, E. Shaposhnikov and B. Yeltsin and to hear the case about the genocides that were committed in Baku and Khojali as it is crime against the mankind.
4. I ask to inform me about your decision.
Respectfully, Felix CERTVADZE
10.10.2005
On the image: map № 10. New Armenians seems so – republic of Armenia after invasion and annection of all karabakh lands of Azerbaijan, (the annexed lands are shaded). Result of the invader war in 1992-1994, supported by Russia.
Discord in the parliament of Armenia
Majority of the deputies don’t risk of recognition of the separatist “NKR”
The problem of recognition of independence of so called “Nagorno Karabakh Republic”, the separatist regime which was established as the result of “Armenian movement” over invasion of the territories of Azerbaijan, was again on the agenda at the parliament of Armenia.
As you know, the mainly interested figure in the solution of the underlined problem is the “Heritage” party leading by the former minister for foreign affairs of Armenia Raffi Ovannisyan. Last time the parliamentary fraction suggested the project of the law “About recognition of independence of NKR” recently, and on December 9 of the annual year this project was discussed at the sitting of the parliament. Making a speech before deputies and calling them to vote for the project, R. Ovannisyan noted: “This project has the common-national meaning and is important for the future families”. Until the voting Galust Saakyan, head of the parliamentary fraction of the Republic party of Armenia also made a speech, who said that “coalition (alliance parties – Republic party of Armenia (RPA), “Flourishing Armenia”, “Orinac erkir” – G. J.) won’t participate in the voting as one-sided recognition of NKR by Armenia at the present moment doesn’t base on the constructive position of the president of Armenia in the negotiations with Minsk Group of OSCE which is supported by the parliamentary coalition”.
According to mass media, as the result of the voting, only 13 deputies of 131 voted for the law project, but none of the alliance fractions of the parliament took part in the voting and it shook the representatives of the parties. “We are surprised of the behavior of the parliamentary majority. As the result, we note 19th annual of referendum over independence of “NKR” not recognizing the republic. All following responsibilities for increasing of the situation are on the powers of Armenia, and we warn that it isn’t needed to search for them in the international organizations, foreign states, except of itself”, – Stepan Safaryan, head of the fraction stated.
Artyusha Shahbazyan, the member of the other opposite party “Dashnaksutyun” was also regretted of the fall of the voting: “There was demonstrated unintelligent and baseless insistent by Armenia against the fraction “Heritage” – the coalition and author of the document, about the law project “About recognition of independence of Nagorno Karabakh Republic”, – said the deputy.
A. R. Ovannisyan, getting angry of behavior of the deputies of the coalitions, stated: “Absence in the voting over the problem of recognition of the independence of Nagorno Karabakh is the same with the problem “genocide of Armenians”. Personally for me the problem of recognition of the independence of “NKR” is as much important and principal as the problem “genocide of Armenians”… Coalitions of the powers couldn’t make any step about that Armenia is a sovereign country and can make decisions by itself… After this position nobody has a moral right to accuse the international community for the wrong position about Karabakh”.
It is clear that the restraint of the major deputies of the Armenian parliament over the underlined problem is restricted by the danger of provocation of escalation of the conflict: if the Armenian side makes this step, then the negotiation process in the face of Minsk Group (MG) of OSCE will completely become insolvent that can bring the military way of the solution of the Armenian-Azerbaijan conflict. And it would be very serious problem for Armenia, the occupant country.
And the Armenian side isn’t squeamish about piar-companies, threatening Azerbaijan time by time as if they can recognize the independence of “NKR” at any moment. It is meaningless to follow the examples. Recently, exactly on December 2 of this year at the summit of OSCE in Astana the president of Armenia Serj Sarkisyan shamelessly threatened the Azerbaijan side: “Armenia will have to recognize the independence of Nagorno Karabakh de-jure if there are started military operations by the Azerbaijan side and will take measures by provision of the safety of its population by all possible ways”. He also made such statement in his speech at the summit of OACS on 8 December in Moscow.
So, the attempt of the deputies of the parliament of Armenia about recognition of the separatist establishment called “Nagorno Karabakh Republic” made a big discord in the legislative branch of the country. Besides, the fact is this: although this is some part of the Armenian community, there are people who understand the absurdity of the underlined idea although the deceptive image…
And there is another reality that all Armenians have to understand: Nagorno Karbakh is the historical Azerbaijani territory and it will be so always not depending on if Armenia will recognize it or no.
G. JABRAYILLI,
“Voice of Karabakh”